HALEU: Potential Safeguards and Non-Proliferation Implications

12 September 2024 • 
Non-Proliferation, Publications, Reports and Papers
Non-Resident Senior Fellow John Carlson explains how the proposed use of high-assay low enriched uranium may impact IAEA safeguards and the non-proliferation regime.
Share this:

Interest in high-assay low enriched uranium (HALEU) fuel is increasing globally, in particular for small modular reactor fuel cycle concepts. In this context, a new paper written by VCDNP Non-Resident Senior Fellow John Carlson analyses the implications of HALEU for the International Atomic Energy Agency’s safeguards system and the non-proliferation regime. HALEU is uranium enriched between five and 20 percent uranium-235. Its higher enrichment compared to uranium typically used in power reactors today makes it more efficient, but also poses potential proliferation risks.

A billet of enriched uranium. Source: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management via Wikimedia Commons

First, the paper argues that HALEU is more attractive than current low enriched uranium fuel for diversion to a clandestine nuclear weapon program. Re-enrichment of HALEU from near 20 percent U-235 to weapon-grade (90 percent or more) would only take about 40 percent of the effort needed to enrich standard power reactor fuel to this level. There are even suggestions that HALEU near 20 percent enrichment could be used directly in a nuclear explosive device. Current IAEA safeguards approaches may need to be adapted to take account of HALEU's potentially higher proliferation risk.

In addition, HALEU may revive interest in reprocessing. While there are major uncertainties about reprocessing costs for HALEU, its higher fissile content could make reprocessing more viable than is the case with LEU fuel. Unless the plutonium in spent HALEU remains in a mix with the uranium after reprocessing, this would result in increased quantities of separated plutonium. Further, the construction of additional reprocessing plants would increase the latent capability of states with such facilities to produce weapons-usable material.

Mr. Carlson concludes that the use of HALEU could require safeguards inspections to be increased in frequency and intensity, as well as being supplemented by additional technical and institutional measures, including consideration of multilateral fuel cycle approaches. He suggests that governments and the IAEA need to assess the safeguards and non-proliferation implications of HALEU to ensure that any additional measures required are introduced in good time.


Related Experts

John Carlson
Non-Resident Senior Fellow

Related Content

A Comment on Nuclear-Powered Submarines: Let’s All Just Take a Breath

VCDNP Research Associate Noah Mayhew comments in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists on the AUKUS partnership with a view on the status of the provision of nuclear powered submarines to Australia.
Read more

Nuclear Risk Reduction and the Tenth NPT Review Conference

15 June 2021 • 
On 31 May 2021, the VCDNP held a webinar on the risk of use of nuclear weapons and risk reduction measures in the context of the upcoming Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Read more
1 2 3 102
cross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram