The OSCE in 2030? Let's First Survive the New Cold War

27 March 2018 • 
Arms Control, Commentary, Publications
VCDNP's Ulrich Kühn published an op-ed in the Security and Human Rights Monitor reflecting on an event that looked at the future of the OSCE.
Share this:

On 6 March 2018, the International Institute for Peace in Vienna organized an evening event on the future of the Organization for Security and Co-operaton in Europe (OSCE) against the background of the growing tensions between the West and Russia. VCDNP's Ulrich Kühn subsequently sat down and thought about the implications of that event and the challenges the OSCE is facing in general. The resulting short op-ed was published on 16 March 2018 on the Security and Human Rights Monitor blog.

The views conveyed in the op-ed are the author’s sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent the views of the VCDNP.

Excerpt from the op-ed:

[...]

But what is the actual contribution of the OSCE to today’s security, aside from dialogue, and what could it be in twelve years from now? The new OSCE Secretary General, Swiss diplomat Thomas Greminger, started off by painting a rosy picture which included almost everything from successful disarmament and gender equality to better inter-human behavior and clean air. His utopian vision came across more as a deliberate counter-narrative to the currently poor state of European security.

Perhaps, Lukyanov was not in the mood for this fine-tuned form of Swiss irony and instead poured out doom and gloom. In one of his more remarkable comments he reminded the audience that now, after Washington has also officially named Russia a “strategic competitor” and “revisionist power” in its latest official documents, and after Vladimir Putin’s effect-seeking missile show, “we are really in a New Cold War” – and perhaps one that is even less stable than its predecessor. Lukyanov made it clear that he doesn’t count on the Europeans to diffuse tensions. For Russia, the Europeans do not matter strategically, he extrapolated, adding that this might change in the future but, historically seen, European empowerment never meant anything good for Russia. At that point, the well-known Russian commentator almost sounded as if he welcomed the New Cold War as long as Washington stays engaged in NATO and as long as both sides do what they are historically familiar with: deterring each other and, if necessary, engaging in arms racing.

[...]

Read the full article here.


Related Experts


Related Content

cross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram