What’s Next for the AUKUS Submarine Deal?

28 April 2023 • 
Commentary, Non-Proliferation, Nuclear Safeguards, Publications
Following the AUKUS countries’ announcement of their intention to move forward with the provision of nuclear powered submarines to Australia, Research Associate Noah Mayhew published his analysis in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Share this:
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, US President Joe Biden, and UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak met on March 13, 2023, to announce the next steps in the AUKUS partnership. Credit: President Biden/Twitter via Wikimedia Commons

In November 2022, VCDNP Research Associate published his reflections in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists on the “known knowns” and “known unknowns” about the Australia‑United Kingdom‑United States (AUKUS) partnership, which aims to provide Australia with nuclear‑powered submarines.

In March 2023, the AUKUS partners announced their intention to move forward with the provision of the submarines to Australia, following an 18‑month consultation period.

Following this announcement, Mr. Mayhew published a follow‑on article in the Bulletin to assess what could be next for the AUKUS partnership. In the piece, Mr. Mayhew details what is now known about the submarine deal, namely that the deal would move forward in a phased approach over the next few decades and that Australia has already been in touch with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to begin nuclear safeguards arrangements applicable to the deal.

The article also contains analysis of questions yet to be answered, such as implications for the enrichment of the fuel of the new submarines the AUKUS countries aim to jointly design and build under the partnership, whether a new design is necessary at all, and potential barriers to the deal moving forward. Some of these barriers include the requirement for the United States Congress to approve parts of the submarine deal, the question as to whether or not approval by the IAEA Board of Governors would be required and the reactions in Vienna of Member States opposed to the partnership.

Ultimately, Mr. Mayhew concludes that no precedent for safeguards arrangements for naval nuclear propulsion has yet been set and, as such, “there still isn’t anything to panic about.”


Related Experts

Noah Mayhew
Senior Research Associate

Related Content

The Proliferation Implications of Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: A Conversation with Professor Nicholas Miller

28 February 2023 • 
In this episode of Machiavelli in the Ivory Tower, hosts Sarah Bidgood (CNS) and Dr. Hanna Notte (VCDNP) speak with Nicholas Miller, associate professor in the Department of Government at Dartmouth College. Their conversation focuses on the proliferation implications of Russia’s war against Ukraine one year on.
Read more

Gender equality: Why is it still up for debate?

In a piece for the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Senior Research Associate Federica Dall’Arche highlights how the G7 debate over abortion rights is the latest example of a regressive trend on gender equality issues, including in the nuclear field.
Read more
1 2 3 131
cross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram