The US Withdrawal From the Open Skies Treaty

24 June 2021 • 
Arms Control, Commentary, Publications
VCDNP Senior Fellow Nikolai Sokov has authored a new article for the IMEMO journal “Pathways to Peace and Security” that examines the factors that led to the US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty and what could be next in arms control.
Share this:
The Tupolev Tu-154M-LK-1 aircraft, converted for use as an Open Skies monitoring aircraft. Image Courtesy of: Dmitry Terekhov via Wikimedia Commons.

The almost certain collapse of the Open Skies Treaty following United States’ decision to withdraw and inevitable Russian reaction is yet another example of the gradual dismantling of the network of arms control and confidence-building regimes created after the end of the Cold War. What led to this point and what might US President Biden do to keep US-Russian nuclear arms control from perishing completely? VCDNP Senior Fellow Nikolai Sokov addresses these and other questions in his new article in Pathways to Peace and Security, an academic journal published by the Institute of World Economy and International Relations of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IMEMO).

In the article, Dr. Sokov argues that the crisis in arms control, including the Open Skies Treaty, did not appear suddenly, but rather manifested slowly over several US presidents. The US and Russia had traded allegations of violating the treaty for some years, including violations related to the treaty itself and other reasons such as Open Skies flights over disputed territory. The decreased priority placed on arms control by the United States was compounded by the belief that weak arms control regimes were preferable to limitations on US activities and that the US was sufficiently advanced to remain ahead of any competitors, including Russia.

While arms control issues are more effectively addressed through detailed, difficult negotiations and compromises, Dr. Sokov notes that the evolving US approach to perceived treaty violations by Russia amounted to an ultimatum to Moscow to admit to violations and address them based on the US’ preference. He explains Russia’s decision to follow suit by withdrawing from Open Skies as driven both by political motives and, in cost-benefit terms, by concerns that the United States would keep access to data on Russia collected under the treaty through the US NATO allies.

Dr. Sokov expressed the view that it is too early to tell what US President Biden’s policies will be on arms control. On one hand he observes that President Biden’s quick decision to extend the 2010 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) was a positive step. On the other hand, the Biden administration has announced that it will not be returning to Open Skies. In his view, the demise of the Open Skies Treaty is all but a forgone conclusion. Whether it can be replaced by a new mechanism in the future remains to be seen but does not appear likely.

Read the full article


Related Experts

Dr. Nikolai Sokov
Senior Fellow

Related Content

Putting Off the Crisis? Angela Kane and Nikolai Sokov on New START Extension

1 February 2021 • 
Following the decision by US and Russian leaders agreed to extend New START for a full five years, VCDNP Senior Fellows Angela Kane and Nikolai Sokov commented to Lenta.ru, published 26 January 2021.
Read more

Death Dust: The Rise, Decline and Future of Radiological Weapons Programmes

21 June 2024 • 
The VCDNP hosted a seminar on State radiological weapons programmes, informed by the recently published book Death Dust, including past case studies and prospects for their future regulation.
Read more
1 2 3 53
cross
linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram